LEY ANTIPIRATERIA
El Consejo de Ministros aprobó la reforma del Código Penal que contempla la condena de hasta seis años de prisión para quien incluya en su página web listados de enlaces a contenidos que son objeto de propiedad intelectual. El juez podrá ordenar su retirada e incluso el bloqueo del portal, según el borrador enviado al Consejo de Estado.
El objetivo es perseguir las páginas que permiten la obtención de un listado de enlaces a través de los cuales se puede acceder ilícitamente a obras protegidas por los derechos de autor (películas, libros...). En ningún caso se actuará contra usuarios o buscadores neutrales, ni contra los programas P2P que permiten compartir contenidos.
En concreto, se persigue la explotación económica, reproducción, plagio, distribución y comunicación pública de una obra, sin autorización de los titulares, con ánimo de obtener un beneficio directo o indirecto (a través de publicidad, por ejemplo), así como facilitar el acceso a la localización de obras o prestaciones protegidas en internet.
COMO VERÉIS LA ÚNICA MANERA DE COMPARTIR LEGAL ES CON P2P, EN GMAIL TENEMOS UNA HERRAMIENTA P2P QUE ES Google Drive. ESTO NOS ASEGURA CUMPLIR CON LA LEY, YA QUE, COMPARTIMOS GRATIS Y SOLO A NUESTRA FAMILIA DE AMIGOS.
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta ENTREVISTAS. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta ENTREVISTAS. Mostrar todas las entradas
jueves, 23 de octubre de 2014
Alan Parsons (Entrevista)
México (17 de octubre).- Alan Parsons aseguró que en toda su carrera como ingeniero de sonido, el no haber trabajado de nuevo con la banda Pink Floyd ha sido una de las cosas que lamenta que no se hayan podido llevar a cabo.
El británico es conocido en el medio musical, entre otras cosas, por ser un incluyente ingeniero de sonido y logró hacer del octavo disco de la banda, “The dark side of the moon”, uno de los trabajos con mayores reconocimientos.
“Una de las cosas es que no me hayan vuelto a hablar para un segundo álbum, recuerdo que sólo cobré 35 libras a la semana y trabajé en el disco que no era tan importante y se volvió importante después, pero ya no me habló la banda para nada”, apuntó el británico en entrevista con Notimex.
Entre otras cosas, agregó que también ha tenido que rechazar algunas propuestas para trabajar con otros artistas por diversas cuestiones, pero ahora tiene en puerta colaborar con un cantante israelí por lo que se mudará un mes a aquel país para realizar el proyecto.
La visita del también músico y arreglista a México se ha hecho cada vez más recurrente y eso es algo que sus fans agradecen y serán ellos quienes harán posible el concierto del británico en el Pepsi Center el próximo 9 de noviembre.
En esta ocasión, Parsons vendrá acompañado por quien fuera vocalista de Boston, Fran Cosmo, y el ex guitarrista de la misma banda, Anthony Cosmo. En otras ocasiones ha llegado con la Electric Light Orchestra.
“Nunca he trabajado con Fran, fue un enlace que se hizo con México para el ‘show’ que se ofrecerá, de alguna manera me gusta la música de Boston, Fran fue el vocalista que sustituyó al cantante original que se suicidó y con quien trabajé 10 años, creo que haremos un buen trabajo y será una muy buena manera de abrir el espectáculo”.
Esta colaboración surge de las decisiones de los representantes y los promotores en cada país, manifestó el artista, quien agregó siempre está abierto a escuchar nuevas propuestas, ya que le gustan los aciertos de los promotores, y lo único que no le gustaría es hacer algo con Lady Gaga.
“Yo amo a Lady Gaga pero tenemos diferentes targets de públicos”, acotó Parsons. El músico, arreglista e ingeniero se ha presentado en diferentes foros capitalinos como el Auditorio Nacional, el Plaza Condesa y ahora en el Pepsi Center.
“Me gusta el Auditorio Nacional, es fantástico y el sonido es muy bueno, le tengo un gran respeto, todos son lugares diferentes y me gustan, me encanta hacer “shows” para público muy grande, es otro tipo de reacción con la gente y los lugares más íntimos son mejores para mí porque se aprecia mejor mi música”.
Alan Parsons es considerado uno de los músicos más incluyentes dentro del rock progresivo, y aunque él no lo ve así, siempre agradece el halago.
“Es un honor que lo consideren así, es una parte del inicio del rock que a veces es más pop progresivo que rock y es el sonido que incluyo en mis discos”, apuntó.
Alan Parsons es un referente obligado del rock progresivo y el genio detrás de las consolas de “The dark side of the moon”, de Pink Floyd, y colaborador como ingeniero de audio en los discos “Abbey road” y “Let It be”, de The Beatles, multinominado a los premios Grammy, innovador y siempre a la vanguardia de la escena musical mundial.- (Notimex)
VER ARTICULO ORIGINAL
lunes, 13 de enero de 2014
Alan Parsons - Don't Answer Me (Live 2012/2013)
Repaso a algunas de las actuaciones en directo de Alan Parsons durante el periodo 2012/2013 el sonido es variado desde soundboard hasta audience. Destacamos una versión en directo de su nuevo single "Fragile".
320 Kbps mp3
-Don't Answer Me (Live 27.12.2013)
-What Goes Up (Live 2013)
-Ace of Swords (Live at Beaumont Cherry Festival)
-Nothing Left to Lose (Live at Beaumont Cherry Festival)
-Damned If I Do (Live in Zacatecas 2012)
-Psychobabble (Live 2013)
-Fragile (Live in Saarbrücken 2013)
-Old And Wise (Live 2013)
-Interview with a Legend Alan Parsons
Etiquetas:
AUDIENCE,
BOOTLEGS,
ENTREVISTAS,
RADIO BROADCAST,
SOUNDBOARD
martes, 20 de noviembre de 2012
BOOTLEG: Eric Woolfson The making of GAUDI DVD
El musical "Gaudi" se celebró en Alemania en el Euro Musical Hall, el diálogo y letras de la música se llevaron a cabo en Inglés. El disco fue lanzado en 1995 por WEA y está actualmente fuera del mercado. En este DVD podremos disfrutar de la realización de este musical, con entrevistas a los actores, técnicos y al propio Eric Woolfson.
LINK1
LINK2
LINK3
LINK4
LINK5
sábado, 17 de septiembre de 2011
Alan Parsons: "El cd está muriendo"

Alan Parsons: "El cd está muriendo"
Por: Manuel Dueñas Peluffo
El británico, que participó en grabaciones de los Beatles y Pink Floyd, presentará su DVD 'Arte y ciencia de la grabación del sonido'.
“La música no debe ser gratuita”, dice Alan Parsons, tajante. La afirmación es dura, casi temeraria, pero tiene fundamento: Parsons es un testigo de los cambios que la música ha experimentado en las últimas tres décadas.
El británico puede decirlo, afirmarlo aunque suene radical, demasiado correcto. De muchos modos, está más allá del bien y del mal. Primero como asistente y después como ingeniero, participó en la grabación de dos discos fundamentales de la historia de la música: Abbey Road, de los Beatles, y The Dark Side of the Moon, de Pink Floyd.
Invitado por el Instituto Distrital de las Artes, Parsons vendrá a Colombia para presentar un DVD, dar una clase magistral y ofrecer un concierto.
¿Tiene alguna ventaja ser ingeniero de sonido a la hora de hacer música?
Creo que sí. Una de las cosas que un ingeniero tiene que hacer al trabajar en los estudios de Abbey Road es estar expuesto a muchas clases de música. Uno debe ser muy receptivo y tener un gusto amplio. No se puede decir, “no voy a grabar eso porque no me gusta”. Uno tiene que aprender a grabarlo todo. Ese es un entrenamiento muy importante. Cada forma musical es una educación.
¿La idea de disco conceptual está muerta en esta época?
Los discos conceptuales fueron de la décadas de los setenta y los ochenta. Hice un álbum de ese tipo a principios de los noventa. El concepto está un poco pasado ahora. Ya nunca más se escuchan discos enteros, ahora se hacen canciones, pero nadie se aventura a un álbum completo. Yo probablemente nunca haga un disco entero otra vez. El cd está muriendo.
¿El cd no tiene futuro?
No. Pienso que tal vez en cinco años, todo será descargado. Habrá tiendas especializadas que los venderán, pero será minoritario. La gente que quiera escuchar música podrá tenerla toda gratuita, y así no habrá música nueva. Estamos en una situación peligrosa porque no se hace nada original.
Es decir, la música no debe ser gratuita...
Creo firmemente que no. Crecí invirtiendo en la música hasta el último centavo que tenía en el bolsillo. Pero es gratis ahora. Incluso si se descarga en iTunes, que es algo valioso para el artista. Hay que reconocer que YouTube es lo más dañino: ahí puedes escuchar cualquier disco, está completamente fuera de control.
¿Qué le queda a la industria, entonces?
Ya nadie hace discos. No tiene sentido hacerlos si no vas a ganar dinero. La música se reducirá al espectáculo en vivo, uno irá a ver una banda y comprará los tiquetes. Pero la música grabada, no. No veo más que los costos de promoción para los conciertos.
¿Qué recuerda de su experiencia como asistente de grabación de ‘Abbey Road’?
Lo que más recuerdo fue que para ese momento los Beatles trabajaban individualmente. A veces funcionaban como una banda, pero cada uno hacía sus canciones. Yo no tuve trabajo creativo. Era el chico que estaba detrás, haciendo el café.
¿Y de ‘The Dark Side of the Moon’?
Podría escribir un libro sobre esa grabación y ese disco, porque era un gran desafío trabajar con una banda famosa por los efectos que usaba, por utilizar todos los recursos del estudio de grabación. Estoy muy orgulloso de eso. Fue un buen resultado. Mi único pesar es que no seguimos trabajando juntos. Habríamos podido hacer más música.
¿Qué recuerda de su primera visita a Colombia?
Tengo muchos buenos recuerdos, y uno solo malo: comimos sushi y a todo el mundo le sentó mal. Entonces, nunca más comeré sushi en Colombia. Puede que esté muy lejos del océano (risas). También me acuerdo de que fuimos al Museo del Oro y caminamos. Fue divertido. Pasamos un gran rato.
Sobre las tecnologías de grabación
“Muchas de las tecnologías modernas quieren emular las análogas, pero no creo que todo cambie tanto en cuanto a cómo pueden sonar las cosas, es sólo que la música moderna va por un lado y la tecnología por otro. Prefiero trabajar con músicos de verdad, estando juntos, tocando instrumentos reales. Algunas personas dicen que el sonido viejo era mejor, pero es que la tecnología nueva es muy joven, y las mejoras irán llegando. Las técnicas podrían sonar como las análogas”.
“Siempre he creído que, desde el estudio, no sólo se puede cambiar el sonido, sino la composición entera, escribir la canción, y es por eso que, cuando trabajé con Alan Parsons Project, aunque Eric Woolfson era el compositor, hacía mis contribuciones a las composiciones”.
“La música no debe ser gratuita”, dice Alan Parsons, tajante. La afirmación es dura, casi temeraria, pero tiene fundamento: Parsons es un testigo de los cambios que la música ha experimentado en las últimas tres décadas.
El británico puede decirlo, afirmarlo aunque suene radical, demasiado correcto. De muchos modos, está más allá del bien y del mal. Primero como asistente y después como ingeniero, participó en la grabación de dos discos fundamentales de la historia de la música: Abbey Road, de los Beatles, y The Dark Side of the Moon, de Pink Floyd.
Invitado por el Instituto Distrital de las Artes, Parsons vendrá a Colombia para presentar un DVD, dar una clase magistral y ofrecer un concierto.
¿Tiene alguna ventaja ser ingeniero de sonido a la hora de hacer música?
Creo que sí. Una de las cosas que un ingeniero tiene que hacer al trabajar en los estudios de Abbey Road es estar expuesto a muchas clases de música. Uno debe ser muy receptivo y tener un gusto amplio. No se puede decir, “no voy a grabar eso porque no me gusta”. Uno tiene que aprender a grabarlo todo. Ese es un entrenamiento muy importante. Cada forma musical es una educación.
¿La idea de disco conceptual está muerta en esta época?
Los discos conceptuales fueron de la décadas de los setenta y los ochenta. Hice un álbum de ese tipo a principios de los noventa. El concepto está un poco pasado ahora. Ya nunca más se escuchan discos enteros, ahora se hacen canciones, pero nadie se aventura a un álbum completo. Yo probablemente nunca haga un disco entero otra vez. El cd está muriendo.
¿El cd no tiene futuro?
No. Pienso que tal vez en cinco años, todo será descargado. Habrá tiendas especializadas que los venderán, pero será minoritario. La gente que quiera escuchar música podrá tenerla toda gratuita, y así no habrá música nueva. Estamos en una situación peligrosa porque no se hace nada original.
Es decir, la música no debe ser gratuita...
Creo firmemente que no. Crecí invirtiendo en la música hasta el último centavo que tenía en el bolsillo. Pero es gratis ahora. Incluso si se descarga en iTunes, que es algo valioso para el artista. Hay que reconocer que YouTube es lo más dañino: ahí puedes escuchar cualquier disco, está completamente fuera de control.
¿Qué le queda a la industria, entonces?
Ya nadie hace discos. No tiene sentido hacerlos si no vas a ganar dinero. La música se reducirá al espectáculo en vivo, uno irá a ver una banda y comprará los tiquetes. Pero la música grabada, no. No veo más que los costos de promoción para los conciertos.
¿Qué recuerda de su experiencia como asistente de grabación de ‘Abbey Road’?
Lo que más recuerdo fue que para ese momento los Beatles trabajaban individualmente. A veces funcionaban como una banda, pero cada uno hacía sus canciones. Yo no tuve trabajo creativo. Era el chico que estaba detrás, haciendo el café.
¿Y de ‘The Dark Side of the Moon’?
Podría escribir un libro sobre esa grabación y ese disco, porque era un gran desafío trabajar con una banda famosa por los efectos que usaba, por utilizar todos los recursos del estudio de grabación. Estoy muy orgulloso de eso. Fue un buen resultado. Mi único pesar es que no seguimos trabajando juntos. Habríamos podido hacer más música.
¿Qué recuerda de su primera visita a Colombia?
Tengo muchos buenos recuerdos, y uno solo malo: comimos sushi y a todo el mundo le sentó mal. Entonces, nunca más comeré sushi en Colombia. Puede que esté muy lejos del océano (risas). También me acuerdo de que fuimos al Museo del Oro y caminamos. Fue divertido. Pasamos un gran rato.
Sobre las tecnologías de grabación
“Muchas de las tecnologías modernas quieren emular las análogas, pero no creo que todo cambie tanto en cuanto a cómo pueden sonar las cosas, es sólo que la música moderna va por un lado y la tecnología por otro. Prefiero trabajar con músicos de verdad, estando juntos, tocando instrumentos reales. Algunas personas dicen que el sonido viejo era mejor, pero es que la tecnología nueva es muy joven, y las mejoras irán llegando. Las técnicas podrían sonar como las análogas”.
“Siempre he creído que, desde el estudio, no sólo se puede cambiar el sonido, sino la composición entera, escribir la canción, y es por eso que, cuando trabajé con Alan Parsons Project, aunque Eric Woolfson era el compositor, hacía mis contribuciones a las composiciones”.
viernes, 3 de junio de 2011
ENTREVISTA: Alan Parsons’ Art of Listening and the Science of Sound part III

Crawdaddy!: Can people get away with just the EQ that is in their DAWs? Do you think that plug-ins or hardware is essential for great EQ?
Parsons: There’s always a box that has more musical sounding EQ than the next, but applying basic principles can be done with any [EQ]. That’s the secret—knowing what you want to achieve with EQ, and if one EQ doesn’t achieve it, then try something else.
Crawdaddy!: How can you can teach that—the art of listening?
Parsons: You can’t teach that. It’s literally, as you said, the art of listening.
Crawdaddy!: You obviously have great ears. Do you have the same ears you had when you were making Dark Side of the Moon?
Parsons: [Laughs] Well, I’m in my 60s now. You can’t change the laws of human development. There was a time that I could hear 19 KHz, and I can barely hear 14 KHz now. I think I’m blessed to have built-in early warning devices. When I was listening to too much live music, I knew I had to stop. I don’t think I’ve suffered any significant hearing damage over the years.
Crawdaddy!: You are still playing live, so you must keep a manageable stage volume.
Parsons: We all wear in-ear stage monitors.
Crawdaddy!: Do you go to concerts much?
Parsons: Not so much, no, and if I do, I take earplugs. I’m afraid I’m an old man in that respect!
Crawdaddy!: As we mentioned earlier, this loudness issue translates to recordings as well. If only a producer would stand up to a band and say, “You don’t get six guitar tracks; you only get two because anything more is sonic mud!”
Parsons: Well, it’s all about the relationship you have. A producer can’t be a dictator, and he can’t put too much of himself into working with an artist, because it is the artist’s record. But I guess I could argue that with the Alan Parsons Project, I was the artist, in a sense. Although I’m still essentially manipulating and controlling other people—directing would be a better word.
Crawdaddy!: I’ll tell you who needs a producer. The half-time show at the Super Bowl. That was embarrassingly bad, the sound at that show.
Parsons: Ah, yes, but that is often the case.
Crawdaddy!: Well, I’m trying to get my name in there. [laughs] What producers do you admire that are making music these days, or back in the ‘70s or ‘80s?
Parsons: I think that the perfect producer is the one that becomes a respected member of the overall team that makes the record. I’ve worked with so many of them, and there were so many good ones; I’ve always felt that Mickie Most [Jeff Beck Group, Donovan, the Animals] was a great producer. Sadly, he died a few years ago. He had everyone’s respect, and he knew his limits, and he knew the limits of the people he was working with. He always got great results and had a fantastic ear for a song. He could spot a hit song at 10 miles, you know?
Crawdaddy!: What about Bob Ezrin and George Martin?
Parsons: I have a lot respect for those guys, George Martin in particular. I think people can appreciate now that he really was the fifth Beatle.
Crawdaddy!: Your DVD has sort of a hall of fame of recording engineers, producers, and musicians. Was it fairly easy to line them up, and easy to select them?
Parsons: I know them all, of course. We kept bumping into each other at trade shows and at seminars and what have you. I’ve experienced how they work. Of course, engineers never work together; they’re always doing their own thing. But that’s what is so refreshing and interesting to me: To talk to them about their art, face-to-face. That was a hugely fulfilling part of making the program.
Crawdaddy!: Is there any chance of a follow-up DVD, sort of a “Master Class” that goes to the next level technically?
Parsons: We are talking about turning it into a thing where you can qualify for some kind of diploma for having viewed the series. And we are planning live studio seminars where eventually we’ll go through the process of recording a song by a band over a couple of days with a small group of people. It’s hard to compete with all the schools out there. We would have to offer something different, and in a much smaller timeframe.
Crawdaddy!: Well, I think you have already accomplished that with your DVDs. I don’t think the schools can deliver the insight and instruction directly from the kind of artists and studio professionals you have on your DVD. They don’t have the background that you have, certainly.
Parsons: Yeah, the schools, of course, can’t offer the big names. They can offer really good people. But if they were that good, they wouldn’t be teaching in schools… They’d be out there doing the job!
jueves, 2 de junio de 2011
ENTREVISTA: Alan Parsons’ Art of Listening and the Science of Sound partII

Crawdaddy!: Do you think the success of that album changed the band’s attitude towards making records?
Parsons: I don’t know. Our relationship ended for business reasons shortly after [Dark Side of the Moon]. I was certainly up to doing another record, but the business got in the way.
Crawdaddy!: But then you moved on to the Alan Parsons Project, and that obviously worked out.
Parsons: Yeah, it could certainly be argued that the Alan Parsons Project would not have happened if it weren’t for Dark Side of the Moon.
Crawdaddy!: Given how well you were recording in the analog world and how well you knew this stuff, what was the process like moving to digital?
Parsons: It was a slow transition. First came the boxes—the Eventide boxes, and you know, digital delay. And then there was pitch correction, which was previously just a nirvana, just an unattainable thing that people thought, “Oh, you’re never gonna be able to change the pitch on something.” [laughs] So that was pretty magical at the time. And then came the CD technology that allowed us to record digitally and put it on a CD. The sound of early CDs was remarkably gritty compared to how it is now. And at the time all we could concentrate on is how clean it was. You know, no crackles, no surface noise, and the actual sounds seemed to be secondary. And that’s what everybody said—“It’s so clean and so quiet.” And our ears got sort of tuned into [the digital sound] in later years as the technology progressed.
Crawdaddy!: On your DVD, it looks like Steinberg’s Cubase is your DAW [digital audio workstation] of choice?
Parsons: It’s certainly been the one I have spent the most time with. The unfortunate fact of life is that Pro Tools is the de facto standard.
Crawdaddy!: It is. For years it was overpriced for how it sounded and what you got. I don’t believe it ever lived up to its hype in the pre-HD era.
Parsons: I had some bad experiences with Digidesign. You know, I bought these huge systems and then found two months later that they were out-of-date. But I think they have done the right thing with Pro Tools by making it hardware compatible with everything. It clearly works, and I think it’s healthy to have competition.
Crawdaddy!: What kind of commercial music do you listen to these days? Do you listen to today’s music?
Parsons: Only by default, like on the radio or whatever medium it’s on. I don’t tune into radio stations that are playing chart music particularly. And I was embarrassed to look at the album charts just a couple of weeks ago, and I only knew two of the artists in the Top 10. And one of them was the Allman Brothers! [laughs]
Crawdaddy!: Interestingly enough, a lot of teenagers have turned to bands like Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath. I think that’s because there is a lack of good bands coming out on labels. It’s such a business now. All sizzle, no steak.
Parsons: There is a style right now that I don’t particularly like: Heavy auto-tune, heavy compression. It’s very stylized, and I don’t find it appealing.
Crawdaddy!: I think it’s a real problem that engineers over-compress and producers want it over-compressed. And then mastering engineers compress it again, and then radio stations compress it one more time.
Parsons: Yeah, and there’s nothing left at the end of the day.
Crawdaddy!: How do you get these people to stop? [laughs]
Parsons: Form a band and try to be different and try to be real. I mean, this can’t last forever, all this nonsense. It’s got to go back to musicianship. Hopefully a new wave of progressive rock.
Crawdaddy!: I agree, and I hope so.
Parsons: It’s totally manufactured now.
Crawdaddy!: I think part of the problem is that listening to an album used to be a special thing. You couldn’t do it on the bus. You couldn’t do it walking to work. You had to do it in a home or some environment where you’re focused on listening. Do you think the album is a lost format?
Parsons: Absolutely. It’s a thing of the past. We’re in an iPod world now. It’s three or four minute segments. It’s just the way they do it now.
Crawdaddy!: How do you feel about that?
Parsons: It’s disastrous.
Crawdaddy!: Perhaps that’s why vinyl records have made a resurgence. We’ve got two generations now who know little about the album concept—artwork, the production, the story.
Parsons: And part one and part two—side one, side two. That’s one of the biggest loses.
Crawdaddy!: When it comes to studios closing down on a daily basis, I think your DVD fills an important gap—in that, as commercial studios close down and of course the talented professionals who know how to operate them go with them—people are left with little choice but to go at it alone. So now we’ve got people recording in their bedroom who may know how to edit a registry in Windows or how to get real tweaky on a plug-in, but they don’t know the first thing about where to put a mic to record an instrument.
Parsons: And that’s something that people like me are likely to complain about. But I accept the fact that it isn’t necessary to do what’s going on now.
Crawdaddy!: I enjoyed watching your DVD. You seemed very accessible and a very good instructor. Was that hard for you?
Parsons: At every stage, we tried to make it better than it actually was through the editing process. [laughs] The early edits were very different than the final edits. We would literally throw out about 20 minutes, because it wasn’t quite right. It’s actually a miracle that we got it [down to] 10 hours—it couldn’t have been 20 hours long.
Crawdaddy!: So it’s kind of like making a record then?
Parsons: Yeah, absolutely.
Crawdaddy!: You seemed very comfortable talking technical to the camera. Were you?
Parsons: Well, I think that my camera presence is variable. When I see the program, I think, “Oh well, this is early on, and oh, this is when I’d been doing it for a few months.” I did get better at it. And it was all teleprompted and scripted.
Crawdaddy!: It looks great. It’s one thing to know this stuff works, and it’s another to be able to teach it. What are some of the more common mistakes home studio owners make these days that they can easily correct?
Parsons: I think a lot of engineers mic guitar amps too close, particularly live. There are live engineers, you know; they [mic] up against the cloth of the cabinet. I’ve never thought much of that technique. At least a foot away is where I like to put them. And acoustic guitars are quite difficult to record. One little trick I’ve always favored was to [put a] high pass [filter on] it. Get rid of some of the boominess. Really, there is no such thing as making mistakes. But guidance in the right direction is sometimes useful.
Crawdaddy!: It is clear from the DVD that recording is not a hard science. There is an element of art to it. And I thought the section on equalization was great. EQ is a bit of a mystery to many of us. Do you think it’s important to EQ everything in this world of canned sounds and drum loops?
Parsons: I think that EQ is now and will continue to be the most powerful tool for recording. I mean, you can turn a sound inside and out with EQ. And, providing you know the results you are looking for, it’s incredibly powerful.
domingo, 29 de mayo de 2011
ENTREVISTA: Alan Parsons’ Art of Listening and the Science of Sound part I

Home recording studios have been around since, well at least as long as Windows 95 and SCSI (pronounced “scuzzy”) Macs. They have become ubiquitous, and recording technology in its current form is so feature-packed, easy to use, and affordable (thanks to the wonders of the digital environment), home studios are respectable places to produce high-quality media. But the key ingredient missing in the digital home studio is the expertise that is part of the package when you book time at a commercial studio. Owning the technology is the easy part. Using it well is the tough bit. As sophisticated technology gets easier to use and acquire, it also gets easier to abuse (and therefore impede) your attempt to produce your own personal Dark Side of the Moon opus.
Alan Parsons, who received a Grammy nom for his engineering work on the aforementioned Pink Floyd album, has not only recognized this home studio problem, he has done something about it. In tandem with Keyfax New Media, Parsons has just released a three-DVD set aptly titled, Alan Parsons’ the Art and Science of Sound Recording. The set contains over 10 hours of excellent instruction and insight into using gear common to home studios. From acoustic treatments to EQ-ing guitars and vocals, every aspect of the recording process, both as an art form and as a science, is discussed in detail appropriate for the DIY home studio crowd at all levels of expertise. Alan Parsons’ the Art and Science of Sound Recording is a powerful aid to making the best sounding recordings possible.
Parsons started in the business as a tech at EMI where he soon became an audio engineer. He is generous in his DVD series, drawing on his 40-plus years in the industry to give viewers tips and tricks, as well as basic concepts. He was likewise generous when I sat down in my kitchen and spoke to him over my dodgy speakerphone where we covered everything from his time with the Beatles to his new DVD.
Crawdaddy!: Was it a love for music or your love for the technical that got you into EMI?
Alan Parsons: My love of music. In particular, there I was working for EMI, and that was the Beatles’ label. So I thought, “What better way to try and slide my way into the recording industry than with my favorite band?” I thought I was very well-placed to do that.
Crawdaddy!: So given you were a Beatle fan and then there you are engineering at Abby Road….
Parsons: Well, it didn’t happen quite that fast. I was in a very junior position at the point that [the Beatles'] Abby Road was being made. I was an assistant engineer, you know. I was a fetcher, a carrier, one of those kind of guys.
Crawdaddy!: I would imagine you were happy just to do that.
Parsons: Oh absolutely! And actually, chronologically, Abby Road happened after Let It Be. So Let It Be was the first thing I did.
Crawdaddy!: Ah, yes. We tend to forget that because of the release dates. What was your work on Let It Be?
Parsons: Same thing. Abby Road had been made to make the Apple Studio functional [laughs], which it wasn’t. I’m sure you’ve read all the stories about Magic Alex’s studio at Apple. I was part of the team that went in to make sound recording there a reality. And it hadn’t been until that day. We had been trying to shoot the movie without having any sound to record.
Crawdaddy!: So your job was to turn all this disparate pieces of gear into some sort of a recording studio.
Parsons: Well, actually we rejected all that Magic Alex gear and just moved portable consoles in from EMI’s vaults. You’ve probably seen the pictures of those big gray monsters. Those are the mobile recording consoles. And I was brought in as a tape op. They hadn’t taken on any other staff at that point.
Crawdaddy!: What do you think of Let It Be as an album?
Parsons: I think it was infinitely better in what became Let It Be… Naked. That’s how I remember it, and that’s how it was intended to be at the time. For whatever reason, the Beatles themselves were very unhappy with it.
Crawdaddy!: They were not very happy with themselves.
Parsons: Well, I was just a fly on the wall, but even I could tell they were not the best of friends at the time.
Crawdaddy!: So while you were working there, did you ever think, “Wow, I just mic’d John Lennon’s amp”?
Parsons: Well, yes, those thoughts did cross my mind. But, you know, Glyn Johns was the engineer, and I was paid to sit in the back of the room, roll tapes, and keep my mouth shut.
Crawdaddy!: How much recording experience had you had prior to these sessions?
Parsons: Oh, literally just three or four months. You know, just being a trainee and a tape op, just watching other people’s sessions.
Crawdaddy!: And so all the great information that you relate in The Art and Science of Sound Recording—was that learned on the job then?
Parsons: Oh yeah, absolutely. I never went to college or anything for this. It was all on the job.
Crawdaddy!: Pink Floyd‘s Dark Side of The Moon was one of the best-recorded albums, period. Did you know at the time that you were making something historic?
Parsons: I think everybody, the band included, thought it was their best work to date. I certainly did. But I didn’t think it would spend 400 weeks in the charts. I don’t think anyone really knew that it would still be around 40 years later. It’s coming up on its 40th anniversary next year, I think. [Editor’s note: Next year will mark its 39th anniversary]
Crawdaddy!: When it comes on the radio what do you do? Do you turn the station or what?
Parsons: Ha, well I guess I’m sort of immune to it now.
Crawdaddy!: Do you think you have a sound?
Parsons: I don’t particularly, but other people do. I don’t strive to be me in everything I make. It just comes over that way. I don’t know how to explain it. I do have certain favorite things that I do with certain instruments and songs. But, you know, I’d be more proud if people would say you could tell my production rather than my engineering. That would be perhaps a bigger pat on the back for me.
Crawdaddy!: It may be hard to tell them apart. They do appear seamless.
Parsons: So do you hear something on Dark Side of the Moon that you don’t hear on other Pink Floyd albums?
Crawdaddy!: That’s a great question!
Parsons: Sorry, I’m interviewing you now. [laughs]
Crawdaddy!: Well, I have to say, Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, and Animals are my top Floyd albums. And they all have a sonic relationship. Maybe it’s just mystique, as there is some mystique in this business, but I think Dark Side of the Moon does have a certain airiness to it. A sort of tonal perfection. And I think that Dark Side of the Moon is easily the most arranged and produced of those three albums.
Parsons: Yes, I would agree. Times were good then; the band was enjoying the experience of recording together, and they were all good friends. It was fun, and I think it shows
domingo, 5 de diciembre de 2010
Alan Parsons Interview
Bill Carter charla con Alan Parsons en el teatro DTE Energy acerca de Roy Wood, The Move, ELO y sus primeros trabajos con The Hollies.
miércoles, 1 de septiembre de 2010
Entrevista, 16-07-2010
jueves, 12 de agosto de 2010
sábado, 26 de junio de 2010
sábado, 15 de mayo de 2010
sábado, 24 de abril de 2010
Interview: Alan Parsons: The Artist and Scientist of Sound Recording

You just recently completed an event at the Spaghettini Grill and Jazz Club, where you debuted your new DVD release. Tell us a little about what this was all about.
It was essentially my old friend, David Pack from Ambrosia -- he's the voice of all the hits from Ambrosia, we've been friends ever since we worked together back in the mid-70s when I mixed their first album and produced their second. We sort of alternated between his activities and mine. He played music from the Ambrosia days, and some of the stuff he's been doing in recent times, particularly from Beach Boys and Beatles covers. I talked about my beginnings with Dark Side of the Moon and we played a lot of material in Surround Sound, which I think a lot of people were hearing for the first time in that particular audience.
And then I showcased my latest venture, which is a DVD series called "The Art & Science of Sound Recording." That was, I think, very well received.
Is that going to be generally available, or targeted toward a technical audience?
Oh yeah, absolutely! It's already available online in part -- the Website is ArtandScienceofSound.com.
Working in the IT field, and attending school with a bunch of computer and electrical engineer techies, the thing I learned musically is that, in these circles particularly, Alan Parsons is a rock god. But we've also had some debates about certain songs, and this is my opportunity to put some of those debates to rest. For instance, the meaning of the title to I, Robot's "Genesis Ch. 1 v. 32."
If you know the Bible at all, you will recognize that that chapter and verse does not exist. So it was designed to be a little bit mysterious, suggesting that there was an undisclosed verse that represented the future or the notion that God created the Earth, and then he created Man, and then possibly Man created Robot. So that was the thinking behind it.
There's also a track on Eve that includes Morse Code.
Yes, on "Lucifer." The one that's up front, the one that you hear very clearly, that's "Eve" spelled in Morse Code. But the sort of random Morse Code that you hear at the beginning of the album, that was just taken straight off short wave, and I have absolutely no idea what it says. I think somebody, somewhere, once drew attention to that and did translate it, but I don't know that it had any real bearing on anything -- there was nothing particularly interesting embedded in there.
And lastly, were the models for the album cover of Eve made up to appear with lesions, or were these real cases?
Oh no, they were definitely made up. They were totally beautiful models in every way. I only met one of them, but they were the real thing. We did get some negativity about that cover -- some people said it was anti-feminist.
The Alan Parsons Project had a very distinctive sound. You could pick up a new album, and within moments immediately identify it as an APP product. What do you consider to be the formula for an Alan Parsons Project song that makes them distinct and yet part of the collective?
It's interesting that people have said that, because I never consciously made any kind of attempt to give the Project a sound. I think one could argue that I used the same philosophy in all my productions, not just for the APP. People have said that the stuff I did with Al Stewart was distinctly my sound as well.
I don't hear it. I just work on instinct, and a series of automatic decisions. So I'm very interested to know the answer to that question myself. I can't describe what it is that makes it sound like me.
Whatever it was, it seems to not only have followed you into your solo work, but also tagged along with Eric Woolfson into his work. "Freudiana" is fraught with the APP aesthetic.
Well, "Freudiana" was Eric and I working together in the same conditions as everything else. Just because it wasn't called the Alan Parsons Project, it didn't make it any less... I mean, it started life as an Alan Parsons Project. It was only with the notion that it would hit the theatre stage that the title changed. It was The Alan Parsons Project to start with. It would have been the album after Gaudi.
Sadly, your longtime APP partner, Eric Woolfson, passed away last December, and I was wondering if you might want to comment on that.
Only that it was very sudden news. Very unexpected. I was on tour in Germany at the time, and made an announcement to a large audience of people in Mannheim who were clearly shocked as well. He had been ill. He'd had a fight with cancer for some five years, I believe, but he very bravely never made that public. He just kept it to himself and his family. I knew, but he'd asked me not to spread the word.
You've made such groundbreaking strides in sound engineering. These days, however, wonder if artists are relying on that technology overly much, rather than on actual vocal talent.
I think you've got a point there. If you're a singer, you can sing a song two or three times and it's pretty likely that thru cutting and pasting and autotuning you're going to able to get it sounding pretty good -- which, of course, wasn't the case originally.
I had known APP songs that had broken into the top forty, but was really introduced to the group in college with Stereotomy. And I expressed that I really wanted to see the group in concert, and was told, "Well, that can never happen because so much of the sound is studio produced." But you were finally able to begin live performances after a while.
It was a decision we'd made after we'd completed the first of the solo albums, Try Anything Once. The band that played on that album, two of the guys who'd played on virtually everything else with the project -- Ian Bairnson and Stuart Elliot -- and also Andrew Powell... we just wanted to give the album every possible chance of success. So we decided to put a band together and put it on the road.
The difficulty in the past had always been, "What do I do?" You know, the record producer is only a dark figure in a live performance situation. So I dusted off my guitar and re-learned my three chords and managed to pull it off.
I understand you have a handful of shows coming up in the near future.
Yes, anything that's confirmed will be on the website. But we've got a confirmed show in Paris in June; we've got some confirmed shows in Holland in December; and we've got one confirmed show in Monterey Mexico in the middle of May.
The U.S. is out of luck this time?
I think it's largely for economic reasons. The promoters are just not ready to make the investment, and they play it safe and get acts that they've worked with before. I'm not saying it's a lost cause -- home grown dates tend to happen at quite short notice. I'm pretty comfortable we'll be doing something in the summer.
My player has worn a groove in A Valid Path, so I'm ready for a new album. Do you have one coming anytime in the foreseeable future?
There's a new song which I wrote for the "Art & Science" project called "All Our Yesterdays," and that will be out online quite soon. The interesting thing (for anybody's who's interested) is that you see the track developing pretty much in the studio from the earliest stages to the final mix. I think it turned out pretty well, and one day that song will be part of an album, but for the moment it's just a one-off single release. It's there essentially to promote the DVD series.
A friend of mine wanted me to ask if you were surprised at all by your name being dropped in "Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me" as one of Dr. Evil's creations.
It was a surprise. I knew nothing about it, and it was already in theaters before I knew about it. I saw it as a huge compliment. I was very touched by the fact that Mike Myers would consider me a big enough celebrity to put my name to something -- even if it was a laser beam.
It was essentially my old friend, David Pack from Ambrosia -- he's the voice of all the hits from Ambrosia, we've been friends ever since we worked together back in the mid-70s when I mixed their first album and produced their second. We sort of alternated between his activities and mine. He played music from the Ambrosia days, and some of the stuff he's been doing in recent times, particularly from Beach Boys and Beatles covers. I talked about my beginnings with Dark Side of the Moon and we played a lot of material in Surround Sound, which I think a lot of people were hearing for the first time in that particular audience.
And then I showcased my latest venture, which is a DVD series called "The Art & Science of Sound Recording." That was, I think, very well received.
Is that going to be generally available, or targeted toward a technical audience?
Oh yeah, absolutely! It's already available online in part -- the Website is ArtandScienceofSound.com.
Working in the IT field, and attending school with a bunch of computer and electrical engineer techies, the thing I learned musically is that, in these circles particularly, Alan Parsons is a rock god. But we've also had some debates about certain songs, and this is my opportunity to put some of those debates to rest. For instance, the meaning of the title to I, Robot's "Genesis Ch. 1 v. 32."
If you know the Bible at all, you will recognize that that chapter and verse does not exist. So it was designed to be a little bit mysterious, suggesting that there was an undisclosed verse that represented the future or the notion that God created the Earth, and then he created Man, and then possibly Man created Robot. So that was the thinking behind it.
There's also a track on Eve that includes Morse Code.
Yes, on "Lucifer." The one that's up front, the one that you hear very clearly, that's "Eve" spelled in Morse Code. But the sort of random Morse Code that you hear at the beginning of the album, that was just taken straight off short wave, and I have absolutely no idea what it says. I think somebody, somewhere, once drew attention to that and did translate it, but I don't know that it had any real bearing on anything -- there was nothing particularly interesting embedded in there.
And lastly, were the models for the album cover of Eve made up to appear with lesions, or were these real cases?
Oh no, they were definitely made up. They were totally beautiful models in every way. I only met one of them, but they were the real thing. We did get some negativity about that cover -- some people said it was anti-feminist.
The Alan Parsons Project had a very distinctive sound. You could pick up a new album, and within moments immediately identify it as an APP product. What do you consider to be the formula for an Alan Parsons Project song that makes them distinct and yet part of the collective?
It's interesting that people have said that, because I never consciously made any kind of attempt to give the Project a sound. I think one could argue that I used the same philosophy in all my productions, not just for the APP. People have said that the stuff I did with Al Stewart was distinctly my sound as well.
I don't hear it. I just work on instinct, and a series of automatic decisions. So I'm very interested to know the answer to that question myself. I can't describe what it is that makes it sound like me.
Whatever it was, it seems to not only have followed you into your solo work, but also tagged along with Eric Woolfson into his work. "Freudiana" is fraught with the APP aesthetic.
Well, "Freudiana" was Eric and I working together in the same conditions as everything else. Just because it wasn't called the Alan Parsons Project, it didn't make it any less... I mean, it started life as an Alan Parsons Project. It was only with the notion that it would hit the theatre stage that the title changed. It was The Alan Parsons Project to start with. It would have been the album after Gaudi.
Sadly, your longtime APP partner, Eric Woolfson, passed away last December, and I was wondering if you might want to comment on that.
Only that it was very sudden news. Very unexpected. I was on tour in Germany at the time, and made an announcement to a large audience of people in Mannheim who were clearly shocked as well. He had been ill. He'd had a fight with cancer for some five years, I believe, but he very bravely never made that public. He just kept it to himself and his family. I knew, but he'd asked me not to spread the word.
You've made such groundbreaking strides in sound engineering. These days, however, wonder if artists are relying on that technology overly much, rather than on actual vocal talent.
I think you've got a point there. If you're a singer, you can sing a song two or three times and it's pretty likely that thru cutting and pasting and autotuning you're going to able to get it sounding pretty good -- which, of course, wasn't the case originally.
I had known APP songs that had broken into the top forty, but was really introduced to the group in college with Stereotomy. And I expressed that I really wanted to see the group in concert, and was told, "Well, that can never happen because so much of the sound is studio produced." But you were finally able to begin live performances after a while.
It was a decision we'd made after we'd completed the first of the solo albums, Try Anything Once. The band that played on that album, two of the guys who'd played on virtually everything else with the project -- Ian Bairnson and Stuart Elliot -- and also Andrew Powell... we just wanted to give the album every possible chance of success. So we decided to put a band together and put it on the road.
The difficulty in the past had always been, "What do I do?" You know, the record producer is only a dark figure in a live performance situation. So I dusted off my guitar and re-learned my three chords and managed to pull it off.
I understand you have a handful of shows coming up in the near future.
Yes, anything that's confirmed will be on the website. But we've got a confirmed show in Paris in June; we've got some confirmed shows in Holland in December; and we've got one confirmed show in Monterey Mexico in the middle of May.
The U.S. is out of luck this time?
I think it's largely for economic reasons. The promoters are just not ready to make the investment, and they play it safe and get acts that they've worked with before. I'm not saying it's a lost cause -- home grown dates tend to happen at quite short notice. I'm pretty comfortable we'll be doing something in the summer.
My player has worn a groove in A Valid Path, so I'm ready for a new album. Do you have one coming anytime in the foreseeable future?
There's a new song which I wrote for the "Art & Science" project called "All Our Yesterdays," and that will be out online quite soon. The interesting thing (for anybody's who's interested) is that you see the track developing pretty much in the studio from the earliest stages to the final mix. I think it turned out pretty well, and one day that song will be part of an album, but for the moment it's just a one-off single release. It's there essentially to promote the DVD series.
A friend of mine wanted me to ask if you were surprised at all by your name being dropped in "Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me" as one of Dr. Evil's creations.
It was a surprise. I knew nothing about it, and it was already in theaters before I knew about it. I saw it as a huge compliment. I was very touched by the fact that Mike Myers would consider me a big enough celebrity to put my name to something -- even if it was a laser beam.
domingo, 18 de abril de 2010
ENTEVISTA

Though most people associate the name Alan Parsons with his prog rock hits of the seventies and eighties, this sound designer has had a passion for the latest technologies that reaches back to his early days with EMI and Abbey Road Studios. As an artist, his hits include "Games People Play," "Time," "Eye In The Sky," "I Wouldn't Want To Be Like You," and "Don't Answer Me." As a producer, he helmed Al Stewart's "Year Of The Cat" and "Time Passages," and as an engineer, his credits include classics such as "The Air That I Breathe" by The Hollies, and a little album you might have heard of called The Dark Side Of The Moon by Pink Floyd.
Alan Parsons' latest project is The Art & Science Of Sound Recording, a three-disc DVD series filmed in high definition that explores various aspects of the field. It not only features the world-renowned engineer/producer, but also many of his colleagues and contemporaries such as Elliot Scheiner and Niko Bolas, plus some narration by Billy Bob Thornton, and contributions by Simon Phillips, The Foo Fighters' Taylor Hawkins, and Michael McDonald. On the technical side, there are discussions about EQ, compression, setting up microphones, the art of "listening," and much more, plus there's a presentation on the history of recording from Edison to the MP3. Alan took more than a moment to talk about his illustrious past that included his days at Abbey Road Studios through his latest technology-focused endeavor.
leer mas
Mike Ragogna: Since your early days of engineering at Abbey Road Studios, you've always been ahead of the technology curve. What are you working on lately?
Alan Parsons: I'm trying to pass some of the knowledge of the technology back to the real world. I've been working on a DVD series called The Art & Science of Sound Recording. If you go to my website, which is alanparsonsmusic.com you'll see a link to this project, a video series which I've written and presented with a guy named Julian Colbeck. It's split into about 24 sections covering everything on recording known to man. It's my attempt to pass on the knowledge to people who might be interested.
MR: Do you also go over aspects of projects you've worked on relative to the information you're covering?
AP: Yes, I often refer to works I've done in the past. What's interesting about it is that it's not only my perspective, it's the perspective of lots of other engineers, producers and artists that I've interviewed during the program.
MR: Who are some of your guests?
AP: Engineer-wise, it's just about anybody who's anybody like Elliot Scheiner, Niko Bolas, Alan Sides, all big name engineers. Michael McDonald is one of the artists. We're still kind of working on various interviews before the full thing is completely wrapped up. Still hoping to get McCartney to do it, still hoping that P. Diddy might do it.
MR: So this is a series on how many DVDs?
AP: It's a three DVD set. But about two-thirds of it is already available as downloadable material from the web.
MR: Where can one find that material right now?
AP: The site is artandscienceofsound.com.
MR: Rumor has it you have a CD/DVD combo being released on the Frontier label?
AP: Well, there's the live album which is just coming out.
MR: Will it cover the The Alan Parsons Project plus your solo material?
AP: It does, though there's only actually one song from the solo material, the rest is all Project hits, basically.
MR: Everything seems to go full circle, you having earned your stripes at Abbey Road Studios. Recently, the facility was in the news because its owner, Terra Firma, possibly was selling it to help generate income due to its enormous EMI debt. How do you feel about a landmark in musical history being sold like that?
AP: I'm pleased to say they seemed to have changed their minds. The building is now off the market, the last I heard.
MR: That's good news, it's a shame that story wasn't as hyped as the potential sale.
AP: Of course, it didn't make the news media because a change of mind is not good news. But that's the word, it's off the market. They've seen the light. They realized they had something that was part of history. If they had sold it, I think it would have been saved by somebody in the industry. But you know, the industry changed, commercial recording facilities are not as in demand as they used to be. It's a new world out there. People are making records on laptops in small studios because they can. It's a whole different ballgame right now.
MR: Speaking of Abbey Road, how did you get your start there?
AP: I actually was working for EMI when I got the job at Abbey Road in a sort of associated department in West London. It was a department that was manufacturing reel-to-reel tapes, which was the way it was then. I'm showing my age here, but it's before cassettes were on the market. You could buy commercial product not only on vinyl, but also on tape on a little plastic three-inch spool in mono. They sounded great, they were very good sounding projects, you see. I worked for that department, doing tape feed maintenance, transfers, and copying master tapes for foreign countries. It was through that association with Abbey Road that I had a sort of in, I knew who to write to ask for the job.
MR: How old were you when you got there?
AP: When I got to Abbey Road, I was 19. But I'd already been working for EMI for three years. I started with EMI when I was 16. I was essentially a high school dropout that went straight into the industry.
MR: Sometimes there are behind the scenes stories the public never hears about when it comes to recording high profile projects. So, that said, how much did you contribute to The Beatles' Abbey Road?
AP: I made tea and coffee, I was a very junior guy in those days. (laughs)
MR: Okay, so you're not telling.
AP: No, I served my apprenticeship, I did my internship as it were, and learned very quickly. Within a matter of weeks of starting at Abbey Road, I was working on Beatles sessions, so that was an amazing experience, of course. And I was learning from the best, from the best engineers in the business...Geoff Emerick, Peter Vincent, Tony Clarke, Ken Scott, you know, all of whom became famous engineers and producers.
MR: Still being modest.
AP: Oh, no, no, not at all. No, I was paid to keep my mouth shut. I was just happy to be sharing the experience. I was there, I was watching it, I watched the album being made. I pressed play and stop and record when told to do so.
MR: Alright, but you did get to do your own projects at the studio. What were some of the first projects you worked on?
AP: The very first session I did was with The Hollies, a track called "Gasoline Alley Bred." It was a small hit for them, it was okay. It would have terrible if it hadn't been a hit because it would have been the beginning of the end of an uninterrupted string of hits over the years. It wasn't one of their biggest, but I did go on to do one of their biggest which was "The Air That I Breathe."
MR: Their producer was Ron Richards, but I imagine you had an idea or two that was used?
AP: Yes, I think I was always ready to pitch-in an idea or two, and Ron was very receptive to that. You know, making records is all about teamwork--the artist, the producer, and the engineer, all working together, provided you have the chemistry between you to make things happen. We're all there to get the best results. If I had a suggestion that I felt would improve the result, then I would speak out or demonstrate it audibly in what I did.
MR: How so?
AP: "How 'bout we make the vocal sound like this?" and I'd twiddle a knob and apply an effect. Just through doing that, you can say you had an influence.
MR: Personally, I feel The Hollies' Another Night album is one of the greatest, under-the-radar pop albums ever made. It had a beautifully "open" sound, and the vinyl's dynamics were pretty impressive. I feel it pushed the envelope beyond most of the records on the market at the time.
AP: Another Night, yes.
MR: To me, it seems that this record was a very big example of your "sound." Can you remember any particular sonic nuances that you might have conjured for this album?
AP: There's one thing I distinctly remember doing, and that was suggesting that we not only double-track the vocals, but we triple-track them, and that made for a better stereo effect. A lot of time, we would have the doubled track on the left side, the tripled track on the right side, and the original vocal in the middle. So, I think that made the overall vocal sound a lot bigger than it had been for The Hollies.
MR: You're also credited as engineering Pink Floyd's Atom Heart Mother and a little record called The Dark Side Of The Moon that ended up being one of the biggest-selling albums of all time. Though, as you said, it's teamwork, here's another group turning the corner sonically and creatively, and look who the engineer is!
AP: (laughs) I'm honored that you would say those things. You know, I didn't engineer Atom Heart Mother from start to finish, I did it with the late Peter Bown. But I did do the mix, and I'm guessing that the fact they felt I did an okay job on the mix led to their asking for me to do The Dark Side Of The Moon.
MR: It's not even arguable that The Dark Side Of The Moon advanced the way rock artists approached their sound quality during that era. Plus it's one of the biggest-selling and continuously-charting albums of all time. All these years later, how do you feel about having been a very significant part of that?
AP: I'm never allowed to forget it. (laughs)
MR: I'm sorry.
AP: Really, barely a day goes by without some reference in my professional career to Pink Floyd. I'm very glad of it, things might have been very different without it.
MR: Most producers and engineers, whether they say it or not, have opinions about follow-up albums by bands when they don't produce them. Considering how Pink Floyd's Wish You Were Here turned out, have you ever listened to that record and thought to yourself how you might have done such-and-such differently?
AP: Absolutely. I was hugely disappointed with it, and remember thinking we should have found a way of working on the two albums, not just the one.
MR: What prevented that?
AP: It was a combination of politics and the need for me to get on with my career. I mean, they made me a very good offer to work for them full-time exclusively, but right at that same time, I was starting to get into production and having hits. So, it just wasn't meant to be.
MR: You worked on Paul McCartney's Red Rose Speedway and Wings' first album which are terrific credits. And in my opinion, you created a new sound with Al Stewart's Year Of The Cat album, with nothing previously sounding like tracks such as "Midas Touch," "Lord Grenville," and especially, "On The Border." On the title track, the saxophone is played aggressively against a rhythm section with big breathing spaces. If you listen to how many pop records approached the sax after that point, you can see that many producers and engineers copped what you did, especially on single mixes.
AP: Really? Didn't "Baker Street" come out around that time as well?
MR: Nope, you beat that record by two years, that was 1978.
AP: It was after? Yeah, that was sort of the big sax record. If I had one radio play for anything of mine for one radio play of "Baker Street," I'd be so rich. (laughs)
MR: But "Year Of The Cat" was huge here in the U.S.
AP: Yeah, and in England. And Al was suspicious at the time at the suggestion of sax. He said, "I never had a sax on my records." But we got a good player, Phil Kenzie, and the next thing I know, he was joining his band. (laughs)
MR: And then comes Time Passages which used the same formula, but again, here comes another leap in the sound. The single "Time Passages" had the most unique electric piano approach of its time--lots of air, but with enough action in the keyboard to make it "play" with a little percussion, as opposed to settling for it to just hover or waiver as most producers and engineers were employing the instrument. I mean, you had the instrumentation of many songs on the radio, but nothing sounded like your end results.
AP: This observation of yours comes out in The Art & Science of Sound Recording. You can put the same set of tracks in one pair of hands, and it will sound totally different than when it's put in another pair of hands. You know, just the initial balance that's set-up by a certain individual will be so totally different that it will sound like a different record.
MR: But it almost seems that each of your mixes pushed the envelope sonically of what was possible at Top Forty radio.
AP: This is just one of those things. Every engineer, producer, whatever, has their own style, and he thinks he's acting on his own instincts. It's those instincts that give the perception that this guy is talented. It's really odd, I can't put my finger on exactly what it is, it's just something in the instinctive reaction that one person has over the other in terms of presenting a mix. That can be the live or die, you know. It makes all the difference.
MR: And when you listen to what you did with John Miles...
AP...wow, you have done your homework. (laughs)
MR: I own all of these records, I know all your stuff. And I know that the album John Miles--another record that never caught on in America--was brilliant for its time. There were three or four potential singles, but he just never got any radio luv beyond FM stations like New York's WNEW that played the heck out of "Music."
AP: That's such a shame because it really deserved to be a hit in the early days of AOR. As you probably know, it was a Top Three in the UK, and it lasted something like six minutes. It broke all the rules.
MR: Do you think it might have gone over the head of the American audience at that time?
AP: I think it just didn't get played because of its length. Radio wanted three minutes, four minutes in those days. It's such a shame because John, to this day, is such a talented artist. I just did a tour with him in December in Germany, the guy's still as talented as ever, still singing that song.
MR: And he guested on albums by The Alan Parsons Project.
AP: Yes, he did.
MR: Recently, we lost your longtime musical partner, Eric Wolfson.
AP: It was in December during that tour that I got the news.
MR: He was your partner for many projects. How did you take the news?
AP: Well, I knew he wasn't well, and he'd been battling with cancer for four or five years at least. But it came as a surprise, I didn't know he had a relapse. It was untimely, it was unexpected. And it was very emotional, it was tough. I was on the road and had to make the announcement to the audience that evening in Mannheim, Germany. There was a very shocked reaction from the audience.
MR: Together, you guys had a golden era that lasted about ten albums, with that run of I Robot through Eye In The Sky in a lot of collections to this day. Which were you and Eric's favorite albums, if you feel comfortable speaking for him?
AP: We both recognized that the first album, Tales Of Mystery And Imagination, broke the most new ground and got us onto the map. That's the one we both feel is the most deserving of any recognition.
MR: Did you have any favorite Alan Parsons Project singles?
AP: Hmmm...you know, we never really tried to make singles, per se. We always strove to make albums work as a whole. In a way, we were born into the right generation to do that because people did go buy an album and sit down, turn the lights down and light up, and play an album from start to finish. It's just something they don't do anymore. And you still had to get up and turn the record over. (laughs) That's a kind of missing link in the chain for me, going from side one to side two.
MR: Well, things got longer and longer, more room.
AP: Instead of simply sitting through the forty-five minute CD, it became the one-hour CD. I think albums became too long because of the CD format.
MR: Exactly, and the culture now uses music for function, you know, for working out or playing sports or background ambiance. You can hardly think of a Top Ten pop album these days that makes an artistic statement as a single body of work.
AP: Well, the iPod generation just wants to download the big hits, they don't care about what happens between the big hits and anything else that's on the album. They just want the song of the moment. It's sad, you know?
MR: What was the creative process like for you and Eric making Alan Parsons Project albums?
AP: Eric was usually the one to come up with the conceptual idea, sometime because he had a couple of songs based around that idea to start with. But sometimes, the concept changed. Pyramid, for example, did not start as an album based on pyramids. It was an album based on witchcraft. We just found there was so much to offer from pyramids--pyramids, pyramid power, the history of the pyramids, Egyptology, etc. We just zeroed-in on that and decided to call the album Pyramid.
MR: Did any other Project albums evolve like that?
AP: We didn't come up with the title Eve until we were way, way into the album. We knew that it was an album based on women, but we didn't have a title.
MR: One of the great things about your music is that it led to great album covers by Hipgnosis. Every one is progressive and memorable.
AP: Yeah, he did a good job for us over the years, as he did for Pink Floyd and countless others. But I've always believed in the strength of the artwork and always lamented the loss of the 12" format.
MR: Although you and Eric parted a while back, was there a shot that you would collaborate with him again on another Alan Parsons Project?
AP: I think with each passing year, it had become more unlikely. We were in different areas, and he was clearly entrenched in musical theater, and my experience with the theater and our music was not a good one. I mean, Freudiana was an experience I'd much rather forget. But he seemed okay with it.
MR: And you did have some great success with him.
AP: It seems odd but, in a way, I spent my entire career with him on the project trying to take away the sort of pretty song aspect of something that might have worked in staged musicals that didn't work on rock records. I would often give his songs a harder edge somehow, just to do something to take the prettiness away.
MR: Did you have any "discussions" as a result?
AP: Yes, I think we did. (laughs) We were sort of legendary about disagreeing with each other about so many things. It was a kind of love/hate relationship, it became more difficult to work together, we did start seeing things in sort of a different light. But a lot of artists go through that.
MR: My favorite group ever, Simon & Garfunkel.
AP: Yeah, right. (laughs)
MR: You and Eric had certain responsibilities when approaching your records, right?
AP: Well, you know, his main contribution--and I will always give him credit for this--was his songwriting. That's what he did, he wrote the songs for the project. Anything that I could contribute to those songs was through production and through ideas developed during the recording. On occasion, we genuinely did collaborate on the writing of a song. A good example would be "Days Are Numbers" that was essentially my chord sequence, my title, my basic chorus line. But he came up with the verse and all the lyrics. Another example was "Breakdown." That was a genuine collaboration between us. "Can't Take It With You" is another one. But most of the time, it was his songs, and most of the instrumentals were my tunes.
MR: How did you decide on some of the guest artists who sang lead. For instance, Allan Clarke?
AP: It just seemed like a nice idea at the time, you know, let's try Allan Clarke. He's up the road, I knew him well. He jumped at the chance, everyone was agreeable, so we just got him. It was great.
MR: And you had return vocalists.
AP: John Miles certainly, and Colin Blunstone was the favorite. You know, everybody loves Colin's voice, so the opportunity to use him was always a good idea.
MR: Are you working on any new music?
AP: Well, I'm just about to release a single from The Art & Science Of Sound Recording project because I wrote and recorded it especially for the program. So, you get to see the entire recording process of that song in the program. I think it'll sell a lot of copies on that basis. You get to see pretty much from start to finish what goes on with one of my productions. It may eventually form a part of a future album, it remains to be seen. But for the moment, it's just a single that will be released April 9th. It will be available on iTunes and everything else, but it will be considered to be promotional for The Art & Science project.
MR: And, of course, you're pressing it up on vinyl, right?
AP: Uh...no plans for that. (laughs) If there's pressure to do so, then maybe we will, yes.
MR: You have at least ten Grammy nominations...
AP: ...I think it's twelve now. I hold the record with Joe Satriani for having the most number of nominations without winning. But you know, think of it. Jimi Hendrix has never won a Grammy, Led Zeppelin has never won a Grammy.
MR: Eh, Grammy, shmammy. That brings us to Ladyhawke. You produced the soundtrack which sounds a lot like an Alan Parsons Project, but Andrew Powell is the "voice."
AP: I think Richard Donner, the director, probably asked me to do it, but by the time it went through all the negotiation process, they handed it to Andrew. But they kind of insisted that at least I produce it. I think maybe Eric was not feeling good about writing instrumental music. Although I would have been happy to do it, I think Andrew was equipped to write it. Writing is a time-consuming process, it really is. If you're gifted in being able to write and present orchestral music like Andrew is, I think it was the right thing to write it. I think I was offered to write the main theme or something. It sounded like me anyway. (laughs)
MR: Now, all in the same period, you did Al Stewart's Year Of The Cat, John Miles' Rebel, and you produced Ambrosia's Somewhere I've Never Traveled album.
AP: Yeah, those were good times. I'm actually doing a solo, unplugged, talk show panel discussion with a small audience in Orange County with David Pack. I think it's on the website.
MR: What was your reaction to being referenced in the Austin Powers movie?
AP: Oh, I loved it! (laughs) The only frustration was not knowing ahead of time. I didn't know until I was sitting in the seat in the cinema, and...okay, I wouldn't have gone to see the movie had somebody not told me to go and do it. It was a complete surprise, and I was open-mouthed when the reference came. But I took it in good humor, and I feel good about it.
sábado, 31 de octubre de 2009
ENTREVISTA A ALAN PARSONS

¿Si volvieras a grabar hoy "Dark Side of the Moon" o "Abbey Road", cómo lo harías?
Creo que aprovecharía todas las ventajas de la nueva tecnología. Por ejemplo, para hacer el loop en el tema "Money"... ¿Sabes a lo que me refiero al decir el loop del tema "Money"?... La canción Money en Dark Side of the Moon.... tiene un bucle sonoro que nos llevó horas y horas juntarlo. Con un sampler y una grabadora a disco duro, hubieramos podido hacer ese loop en diez minutos, ¿sabes?
Sí, pero ¿habría sido lo mismo?
Sí, probablemente no hubiera salido igual... siempre hay una decisión artística aquí. Si tú tienes ciertos elementos a tu disposición, haces las cosas de una cierta manera, y todo surge según cómo y con qué lo has hecho. Las cosas hubieran surgido de forma diferente si se hubiera dispuesto de esta tecnología moderna. Lo que es interesante es que en Dark Side of the Moon fue todo pre-digital, nada de delays digitales; todo era analógico. Incluso los delays eran analógicos
Leer la entevista entera
¿Qué grabación te ha ocasionado más quebraderos de cabeza?
No recuerdo que ningún album fuera especialmente más dificil que cualquier otro. Bueno... sí recuerdo que tuve que esforzarme y pelear un poco con las pistas de Ammnonia Avenue, para conseguir una buena voz en esa canción. Silent Tonight también fue un poco difícil, aunque sólo en la voz... pero hablando en general, todos los Alan Parsons Projects fueron divertidos y nos lo pasamos muy bien. Había un ambiente muy bueno.
¿De cual de tus proyectos estás más orgulloso?
Me siento orgulloso especialmente del primer album, Tales of Mistery and Imagination. Fue como mi primer hijo, y eso marca...
¿Cual es tu opinión acerca de la producción musical hoy en día? ¿Echas algo de menos en la música actual, en comparación con la de hace veinte años?
Creo que a menudo hay demasiado énfasis en la tecnología y no el suficiente en la canción... Todavía me emociono cuando oigo una buena canción con algo nuevo. Sin embargo, en el diseño de The Alan Parsons Project, el enfoque se realizaba sobre la producción y la ingeniería; de lo contrario, no hubiera habido ninguna razón para que existiera con mi nombre en ello. Mi contribución como músico fue muy pequeña (risas). La justificación de que apareciera mi nombre en el proyecto era por mi producción y aportación en el proceso de ingeniería.
¿Cómo ves el futuro comercial de los productores musicales?
Bueno, entrar hoy en día con Internet ganándole la partida a las compañías de discos es un juego muy dificil. Es una partida muy dificil, unos tiempos muy difíciles para los músicos en general... Ya sabes, es muy complicado mantener los derechos de copyright actualmente. Tan pronto como se publica un disco, se convierte en dominio público... y eso lo hace muy difícil. Pero siempre habrá superestrellas que se hagan ricas. Ahora bien, para el que quiera hacer una banda, y grabar un disco, va a ser dificil hacer dinero. El futuro está en las actuaciones en directo. La gente graba un disco y enseguida está en Internet, y la única forma de hacer dinero es vender entradas en un club o sala de conciertos.
Es como volver al comienzo, cuando los músicos tocaban en cabarets, salas de fiesta y sitios así...
Sí, sí... e imagina cómo era antes de que empezaran las grabaciones... La única manera de escuchar música era ir a los conciertos.
Es muy difícil, en el siglo veintiuno, imaginarse lo que se hacía hace cien años, cuando no se había inventado la tecnología que todos conocemos. Así que... bien... Thomas Edison tiene mucho por lo que responder (risas).
¿Cual fue tu primer sintetizador y cual es tu favorito en estos momentos?
Mi primer sinte era un EMS Sinthy A. Era un sintetizador modular, modelado según el VCS3, que fue uno de los primeros sintetizadores modulares asequibles... pero era muy dificil de controlar. Aún así, lo utilicé en la secuencia de I Robot. Ese fue uno de los primeros sintetizadores que tuve. Mi sintetizador favorito ahora es el Yamaha Motif.
¿Cual es tu equipo favorito en el estudio en general?
Ahora tengo unos altavoces B&W que fueron una elección interesante, puesto que de hecho están más reconocidos como de una empresa de Alta Fidelidad que una compañía dedicada a productos profesionales de audio para estudio. Pero he estado trabajando con B&W desde hace ya unos años; también los usó Abbey Road. Me gustaría tener unos más grandes, pero en la actualidad mi estudio no es lo bastante grande: ahora trabajo en el cuarto de baño (risas). En la actualidad, estoy pensando en agenciarme una Yamaha O2R96.
¿Utilizas algún software en particular? ¿Qué plugins estás utilizando en la actualidad?
Pues en estos momentos estoy trabajando con Cubase 4, y bueno... utilizo los mismos plugins que todo el mundo: los plugins de Waves, o de Steinberg, AutoTune... los que utilizan todos. También tengo tarjetas de sonido de Universal Audio en mi ordenador, y utilizo su software.
¿Estás más a favor de lo analógico o lo digital?
He sido un defensor de lo digital desde sus inicios, desde que salió en los años 80, pero reconozco que lo analógico todavía tiene un cierto sonido. Ahora bien, pienso que las ventajas de lo digital contrarrestan en gran medida las ventajas de lo analógico. Y creo que la tecnología digital todavía es muy joven; dentro de unos pocos años podrá emular exactamente todo lo que lo analógico podía hacer. Esta tecnología no puede más que ir mejorando.
Respecto a la masiva proliferación de herramientas de producción y los home studios, ¿crees que esto está enriqueciendo la música?
Pienso que claro, como es asequible... hay dos formas de verlo; puesto que hay tanta gente que puede hacer música ahora, algunos entre tantos deben tener talento, ¿no? Hay tanto volumen de productos musicales hoy en día...
Pero todavía creo que la mejor música, en general, sale de los estudios comerciales con instalaciones profesionales. Si coges un gran lanzamiento cualquiera, por ejemplo, seguro que está hecho en uno de los grandes estudios. Porque pueden hacerlo, pueden permitírselo. Se trata más de un problema de presupuesto que de un asunto de calidad.
¿Crees que es posible conseguir un buen producto final utilizando solo un home studio?
Sí que es posible. Todo depende de las habilidades del operador. Hay muy buena música producida en estudios caseros. Mi elección sería siempre grabar por pistas; grabar mis pistas de batería y pistas básicas en una verdadera consola analógica y pasarlo todo a digital. Mis partes ideales deberían grabarse desde una consola analógica a un disco duro en formato digital, y luego volverlo a sacar y remezclarlo en una consola analógica. A veces tienes la oportunidad de hacerlo, y esa es mi forma favorita de trabajar. Me gusta tener los faders enfrente, ya sabes. El problema de trabajar con pequeñas consolas digitales con varios LEDs... es que es algo frustrante. No puedes ver lo que está pasando.
¿Cuánto de productor y cuánto de músico hay en Alan Parsons?
Es una pregunta interesante, porque me he convertido más en un músico desde la mitad de los noventa, cuando comencé a actuar en directo. Realmente me gustó mucho la experiencia de tocar en directo; estar delante de un público es una experiencia muy diferente... tienes la inmediatez del público frente a manejar el software. Pero en fin, creo que mi habilidad como guitarrista ha mejorado un poco en estos últimos años tocando en directo; aún así, no soy ningún virtuoso; lo hago lo mejor que puedo, y dejo las partes importantes para la gente que interesa.
Eso dice mucho en favor de una persona que es tan conocida en la escena musical.
Nunca he pretendido ser otra cosa que lo que soy. Hay un montón de cantantes e instrumentistas mucho mejores que yo. Sólo fue cuestión de suerte que me saliera bien esto de tocar la guitarra. Fue una combinación de mi talento y el de los otros músicos que me acompañaban.
martes, 8 de septiembre de 2009
Entrevista a Eric Woolfson

"Alan Parsons Project era un grupo tan mío como de Alan, fue decisión mía que el grupo no hiciera referencia a mi nombre. Alan era más conocido, y yo estaba más cómodo en la sombra"
Leer mas
Recientemente has lanzado el disco “Eric Woolfson sings The Alan Parsons Project that never was”. Nos gustaría que les comentaras a nuestros lectores cómo surgió el proyecto, y de qué forma se realizó la selección y recuperación de las canciones.
Hemos ido seleccionando canciones de diversas épocas, y según las finalizaba eran incluidas en el proyecto. Básicamente la elección fue aleatoria. Obviamente “Any other day” corresponde a la etapa de Eye in the sky, y “Rumour goin’ ‘round” pertenece a las sesiones de grabación de Stereotomy. “I can see round corners” se incluirá en el musical Dancing Shadows que estrené en Corea en 2007. Respecto a “Nothing can change my mind”, que planeo incluir en futuras producciones de mi musical Gaudí, no recuerdo exáctamente cuándo la escribí. Estoy constantemente desarrollando nuevas ideas, muchas de ellas intercambiables, y la decisión de incluir una canción en uno u otro álbum muchas veces corresponde a la propia compañía de discos. Otras canciones estaban preparadas para incluirse en segundas o terceras versiones de los discos de Alan Parsons Project, ya que muchos de los temas fueron tratados sólo superficialmente. Por ejemplo, mi disco POE, More Tales of Mystery and Imagination debería realmente haber sido nuestro segundo trabajo, pero al cambiar de compañía no pudo ser. Varias de las canciones que compuse entonces están en este The Alan Parsons Project that never was.
Tengo entendido que Alan Parsons no ha participado en el proyecto. ¿Se lo pediste? ¿Cómo son actualmente vuestras relaciones?
Bueno, el gusto de la gente no suele cambiar mucho con los años, así que si entonces no le gustaban estas canciones no creo que le fueran a gustar ahora. Ademas, necesitaba gente entusiasmada con el proyecto. Alan y yo nos hemos movido por diferentes caminos en los últimos años, salvo últimamente cuando hemos colaborado en la reedición de los discos de Alan Parsons Project.
A pesar del título del disco, incluyes algunas canciones que pertenecen a tu etapa en solitario.
Como compositor de los temas y responsable de las ideas, considero como propias tanto las composiciones que realicé para Alan Parsons Project como las que incluyo en mis musicales. Al rebuscar en mis archivos me sorprendí al encontrar mucho material inacabado, canciones que podían haber entrado perfectamente en los discos del grupo. Ahora doy la oportunidad a la gente para que las conozca. Respecto a las canciones de mi etapa en solitario, aunque se hayan lanzado muchos años después de la separación del grupo todas ellas empezaron a componerse, de una u otra manera, en mi época de Alan Parsons Project.
De alguna forma el título del disco sirve también para reivindicar tu papel en The Alan Parsons Project, en mi opinión bastante poco valorado.
No creo que mi papel estuviese poco valorado, simplemente mi nombre no es muy conocido. Alan aparecía como coautor muchas veces por presiones de la compañía, ya que su nombre era más atrayente. Puede que mi papel a veces no estuviera claro, por lo que me alegro de aprovechar estas entrevistas para dar explicaciones: fue decisión mía que el grupo no hiciera referencia a mi nombre. Alan era más conocido, y yo estaba más cómodo en la sombra.
Has comentado recientemente que esa decisión fue la mejor y la peor que tomaste en tu vida. ¿Estás realmente arrepentido de ella?
Fue la mejor porque disfruté de todas las ventajas del éxito sin pagar el precio de la atención mediática sobre mí y sobre todo sobre mi familia. Fue la peor porque cuando saco un nuevo disco como este tengo que volver a explicar toda la historia, y siempre tengo que usar el nombre de Alan Parsons Project para que se entienda la conexión. Pero para mí las ventajas pueden más que los inconvenientes, así que no, no estoy arrepentido.
¿Fue algo premeditado que todos vuestros discos giraran alrededor de una idea, de un concepto determinado?
La idea de Alan Parsons Project era hacer discos de calidad independientemente de los artistas o los cantantes. En el negocio del cine estaban empezando a ser más importantes los directores (Hitchcock, Kubrick) que sus obras, y nosotros queríamos que cada disco del proyecto girase sobre un concepto central, en lugar de tener una serie aleatoria de canciones sin relación entre sí.
¿Cómo recuerdas aquella etapa? ¿Cuál es tu álbum favorito de todos los que creaste junto a Alan Parsons?
Como cualquier grupo, cuando empezamos en 1975 estábamos tremendamente emocionados y excitados. Entrábamos en terreno poco explorado, y teníamos un montón de ideas que desarrollar. Lógicamente en cada nuevo trabajo se hacía más difícil encontrar ideas frescas. Tras 10 discos estaba claro que nuestras ideas nos llevaban en direcciones diferentes. En cuanto a mi álbum favorito, todos lo son. De todas formas el primero, Tales of history and imagination me resulta muy especial, aunque pienso que nuestro punto culminante fue Eye in the sky.
Lógicamente, nos interesa mucho tu etapa en Alan Parsons Project, ya que ocupó prácticamente 20 años de tu carrera. Sin embargo, tu vinculación con la música viene de bastante antes. Aprendiste a tocar el piano por ti mismo, desde muy pequeño, ¿cierto?
Recuerdo, cuando era un crío, ver tocar a mi tío Fred desde debajo del piano, fijándome en los movimientos de sus dedos y en las notas que sonaban. Empecé a tocar de oído e hice algunos duetos con mi tío. Mis padres intentaron que tomara lecciones de piano, pero me era imposible leer música. Al final aprendí por mí mismo.
Como músico de sesión trabajaste con muchas de las grandes figuras de la segunda mitad de los 60. También escribiste canciones para gente como Marianne Faithfull o The Tremeloes. Siempre he pensado que aquella fue una gran época, tal vez la mejor, para estar metido en el mundo de la música. ¿Cómo fue la experiencia?
Los 60 fueron, sin duda, la época dorada de la música, y yo tuve la suerte de empezar por entonces. Fui contratado como compositor por Andrew Loog Oldham, que como todos los lectores sabrán era el productor y mánager de los Rolling Stones. Andrew necesitaba canciones para muchos artistas, como Marianne Faithfull o Chris Farlowe, y yo se las suministraba. Fue para mí un proceso de aprendizaje, y como músico de sesión me relacioné con mucha gente que luego llegó a ser muy conocida, como por ejemplo Jimmy Page y John Paul Jones, a quienes conocí antes de formar Led Zeppelin. ¡Creo que un día escribiré mis memorias!
También trabajaste con Andrew Lloyd-Webber y Tim Rice. ¿Viene de entonces tu fascinación por los musicales?
Estábamos en la misma compañía, pero no llegamos a trabajar juntos. Sin embargo, los tres teníamos un mismo problema: el tipo de música que escribíamos no era la típica canción de 3 minutos que todos los grupos buscaban. Nuestro trabajo era más conceptual, más temático. Ellos tuvieron la brillante idea de empezar a crear musicales, mientras que yo fundé Alan Parsons Project. Más tarde me di cuenta de que, efectivamente, los musicales eran un vehículo más apropiado para mis composiciones.
Tocabas, componías…También creo que estuviste a punto de ser miembro de los 10CC, en mi opinión uno de los grupos con más talento y menos valorados de entonces. Sin embargo tu primer gran éxito fue como manáger, con “Kung Fu fighting” de Carl Douglas.
Bueno, a principios de los 70 conocí y trabajé con varios músicos que luego formaron 10cc. Eric Stewart ha producido trabajos míos, y yo he producido trabajos de Graham Gouldman. Lamentablemente por entonces trabajar con ellos no me garantizaba unos ingresos fijos, así que me trasladé a Londres. De todas formas me sentí muy confortable, creativamente y artísticamente, con ese talentoso grupo de músicos que más tarde formarían 10cc. Respecto a mi trabajo como mánager, la verdad es que cuando empecé con Carl Douglas ya tenía “Kung Fu fighting” en el número uno. Mi siguiente cliente ya fue Alan Parsons, que era muy conocido por su trabajo con los Beatles y en The Dark Side of the Moon, y que a su vez producía a gente como Pilot, Cockney Rebel, Al Stewart o John Miles.
Siempre has dicho que no te considerabas un cantante. Sin embargo, si no me fallan las cuentas, tus temas de más éxito aquí en España fueron precisamente los que cantabas tú: “Eye in the sky” y “Don’t answer me”, principalmente. ¿Por qué no te prodigaste más como cantante?
Me hubiese gustado cantar más canciones, pero Alan era el productor, y su decisión fue utilizar diversos cantantes en nuestros discos. En los bonus de las ediciones extendidas de los discos se pueden escuchar diversas demos cantadas por mí, grabaciones que utilizábamos como guía para los cantantes definitivos.
Próximamente estrenas un nuevo musical basado en la vida y obra de Edgar Allan Poe, justamente ahora que se cumplen 200 años de su nacimiento. El estreno mundial es en Alemania, ¿cierto? Creo que tus otros musicales también fueron estrenados fuera de Inglaterra. ¿Hay algún motivo especial para ello?
Por algún motivo mi música es mejor recibida en lugares como Alemania, America y España que en Gran Bretaña. No es sorprendente, por tanto, que encuentre más facilidades para estrenar mis obras fuera de mi país. No tengo ningún problema con ello; es más, me divierte trabajar en países lejanos como Corea o Japón. Como escritor me fascina ver la reacción de la gente, sobre todo cuando traducimos la obra a lenguajes que desconozco. Mi próximo estreno mundial (el musical Edgar Allan Poe se estrena el 28 de agosto en Halle, Alemania) será enteramente en alemán, aunque espero girar por diferentes países europeos y adaptaremos la obra a los lenguajes más relevantes en cada caso.
Tu primer álbum con Alan Parsons también estaba inspirado en la figura de Poe, nunca has ocultado tu interés por su persona. También dedicaste un disco a Gaudí, otro artista con una vida agitada. ¿Te atraen este tipo de personajes en los que su vida es en ocasiones tan interesante como su obra?
Bueno, en el caso de Gaudí para mí lo más excitante es su magnífica obra, su vida siempre me pareció bastante gris en comparación. Pero la genialidad de su obra es suficiente inspiración para mí. Muy diferente es el caso de Poe, cuya vida fue en muchas ocasiones más extraña y estrambótica que su propia y extraordinaria obra. Así que Poe me inspira doblemente. No hay ninguna duda de que encuentro inspiración en grandes mentes como Gaudí, Poe o Sigmund Freud.
Bueno, ha sido un placer hablar contigo. Mucha suerte con tus proyectos. ¿Te veremos con alguno de ellos por España?
Gracias a vosotros por la interesante entrevista, he disfrutado respondiendo vuestras preguntas. Espero hacer algunas representaciones en España, obviamente mi musical Gaudí se sentiría allí como en casa.
domingo, 8 de febrero de 2009
ERIC WOOLFSON

NOTA DE ERIC WOOLSFON EN SU WEB:
-"La pregunta que más me han hecho en los últimos 30 años es la siguiente: "siendo el creador y escritor de The Alan Parsons Project, y en ocasiones el cantante, ¿por qué no es llamado ¿The Eric Woolfson project? O quizás ¿The Parsons-Woolfson project?"
- Describo la decisión de llamarlo "The Alan Parsons Project 'como la mejor y la peor decisión de mi carrera. La mejor, porque he disfrutado de los exitos de APP sin tener que tratar con el reconocimiento público y la atención de los medios. La peor, porque fuera de mi familia y amigos, poca gente tiene alguna idea de quién soy o lo que hago, que es un precio, que siempre he sentido que vale la pena pagar.
-En el momento que se reunió con Alan por primera vez, el era conocido en el negocio de la música, después de haber trabajado en el clásico de Pink Floyd "The Dark Side Of The Moon"y con los Beatles. Yo, por otra parte, era relativamente desconocido. Así como para escribir las canciones y letras para APP, yo era también el jefe, también pensaba que sería más beneficioso permanecer en las sombras y que el papel principal se centrara en Alan como ingeniero / productor.
- Cuando en el 2006 Tim Harding-Fraser de Sony Music, me preguntó si había materiales inéditos, versiones alternativas o mezcla de pistas en los archivos de APP, mi primer pensamiento fue "probablemente no mucho". Sin embargo, en la investigación, he descubierto muchas joyas, que había olvidado en los 20 años que Alan y yo trabajamos juntos en el estudio.
Alan y yo no siempre estábamos de acuerdo en lo que sería un buen proyecto de grabación. No es ningún secreto que la reacción de Alan en la primera audición de "Eye in the Sky" y "Don´t Answer Me" fue de poco entusiasmo, y tuve que discutir bastante para su inclusión. Sin embargo, no siempre se aceptaron todas y algunas canciones cayeron en el olvido. Al mirar en los archivos encontramos abandonadas canciones o pistas de canciones incompletas con poca o ninguna línea vocal, y algunas de estas pistas se han incluido en las recientemente publicadas reediciones de los albumnes de APP.
-Todo esto dio lugar a la idea de terminar algunas de las obras, junto con otros materiales que sin duda, hubieran sido incluidos en futuros trabajos de APP.
-Se dice a menudo que no puede haber una cierta magia para el oyente, cuando un compositor canta su propio material.
-En el momento que se reunió con Alan por primera vez, el era conocido en el negocio de la música, después de haber trabajado en el clásico de Pink Floyd "The Dark Side Of The Moon"y con los Beatles. Yo, por otra parte, era relativamente desconocido. Así como para escribir las canciones y letras para APP, yo era también el jefe, también pensaba que sería más beneficioso permanecer en las sombras y que el papel principal se centrara en Alan como ingeniero / productor.
- Cuando en el 2006 Tim Harding-Fraser de Sony Music, me preguntó si había materiales inéditos, versiones alternativas o mezcla de pistas en los archivos de APP, mi primer pensamiento fue "probablemente no mucho". Sin embargo, en la investigación, he descubierto muchas joyas, que había olvidado en los 20 años que Alan y yo trabajamos juntos en el estudio.
Alan y yo no siempre estábamos de acuerdo en lo que sería un buen proyecto de grabación. No es ningún secreto que la reacción de Alan en la primera audición de "Eye in the Sky" y "Don´t Answer Me" fue de poco entusiasmo, y tuve que discutir bastante para su inclusión. Sin embargo, no siempre se aceptaron todas y algunas canciones cayeron en el olvido. Al mirar en los archivos encontramos abandonadas canciones o pistas de canciones incompletas con poca o ninguna línea vocal, y algunas de estas pistas se han incluido en las recientemente publicadas reediciones de los albumnes de APP.
-Todo esto dio lugar a la idea de terminar algunas de las obras, junto con otros materiales que sin duda, hubieran sido incluidos en futuros trabajos de APP.
-Se dice a menudo que no puede haber una cierta magia para el oyente, cuando un compositor canta su propio material.
-Desde luego, me alegro de que cuando cantaba en temas como "Time" o "Eye in the Sky" la reacción fuera muy positiva, y se convirtieran en algunos de nuestros grandes éxitos. Por este motivo, y en respuesta a numerosas solicitudes y amables comentarios enviados a través de los sitios web, canto en todas las canciones del nuevo álbum (The Alan Parsons Project that Never Was).
-Alan Parsons vive ahora en los EE.UU. y su carrera está más centrada en tocar en directo con su banda. Hemos viajado mucho a lo largo de caminos separados desde nuestra última colaboración en el álbum Freudiana en 1990. Por lo tanto, para este álbum, he recurrido a otros dos talentosos ingenieros de grabación - Haydn Bendall y Austin Ince. Ha sido muy divertido trabajar en estos temas, en diversos estudios, en mi propia casa y, por supuesto, en los legendarios Abbey Road Studios. He disfrutado mucho con la experiencia de revisar y completar las canciones que e escrito a lo largo de mi vida. Espero que disfruten de los resultados.
-Alan Parsons vive ahora en los EE.UU. y su carrera está más centrada en tocar en directo con su banda. Hemos viajado mucho a lo largo de caminos separados desde nuestra última colaboración en el álbum Freudiana en 1990. Por lo tanto, para este álbum, he recurrido a otros dos talentosos ingenieros de grabación - Haydn Bendall y Austin Ince. Ha sido muy divertido trabajar en estos temas, en diversos estudios, en mi propia casa y, por supuesto, en los legendarios Abbey Road Studios. He disfrutado mucho con la experiencia de revisar y completar las canciones que e escrito a lo largo de mi vida. Espero que disfruten de los resultados.
Eric Woolfson - noviembre 2008
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)